July 5, 2014 at 8:35 P.M. I am in receipt of what purports to be a communication from Invicta. According to this latest letter, the reason Invicta continued to send me the first form letter is because $28.00 are needed to cover postage costs in order to send me my (presumably) repaired watch.
There are several problems with this purported letter from Invicta: 1). The document is written with a different computer or word processor from all other communications by Invicta; 2). the statement departs from Invicta's previous terms indicating that, upon receipt of $28.00 of the $42.00 "total" cost of repairs, the work would be done and the watch mailed back to me; 3). having sent the full amount of $42.00, Invicta's practice would be to send the watch and bill for whatever additional cost, if any, is required for postage -- in this case (probably) none; 4). this letter supposedly from Invicta is unsigned and deviates from company policy.
Based on my analysis of sentence structure and punctuation, I suspect that the person responsible for this latest communication, ostensibly from Invicta, is also responsible for the text of the communication from"Fernando Fernandez" (allegedly) of the N.Y. Public Advocate's Office, and for the signature of "Cecilia Luce" (allegedly of Invicta), and of "R. Schnezler" allegedly of the Public Advocate's office.
I further suspect that Gilberto Garcia of New Jersey's Hudson County either is responsible for this text or assisted the person who is responsible for these letters.
I will send Invicta a copy of this latest letter and a money order for another $28.00 raising the "total" cost to $70.00 rather than $42.00. I will retain copies of receipts for postage in this pleasant exchange of letters. All communications from me will be sent to Letitia James, Public Advocate of the City of New York and to Invicta by certified mail with return receipt requested.
I anticipate that the next communication from Invicta will be a request for $42.00 to fix my watch. I can hardly wait for that one. ("Invicta Watch Company.")
June 30, 2014 at 1:34 P.M. My letter to Invicta Watch Company was sent out by certified mail 7014 0510 0002 1469 3849 on June 17, 2014. A return receipt with the same number was received by me on June 20, 2014 and it was signed (allegedly and again) by "Cecilia Luce." ("Invicta Watch Company.")
Along with what purports to be "Mr. Fernando Fernandez's" letter -- which I suspect comes from the same source as "Cecilia Luce's" signature -- and the alleged "survey" from the NYPL seeking personal information from me, I will send these items to Ms. Letitia James, New York's Public Advocate, also by certified mail with return receipt. I do not expect to receive a response or acknowledgment from Ms. James's office.
If, or when, I receive my watch or a response from Invicta, or if New Jersey deigns to respond concerning the commission of these many crimes by their agents, presumably, I will post the information online. ("John McGill, Esq., the OAE, and New Jersey Corruption.")
David Sanger, "Sky Isn't Falling After Scandal, N.S.A. Chief Says," The New York Times, June 30, 2014, p. A1. (U.S. continues to seek the extradition of Ed Snowden on the grounds that Mr. Snowden's revelations have done "irreparable harm to U.S. interests and national security.")
"Gov. Christie's Money Trail," (Editorial) The New York Times, June 30, 2014, p. A18. (Misuse of PA funds for Christie's purposes in New Jersey is only the beginning. The N.J. public pension crisis is about to explode and Christie's strategy may be to allow for the explosion.)
Seth Augenstein, "Man Pleads Guilty in $12 MILLION Tax Scam," The Star Ledger, June 25, 2014, p. 17. (ALEJANDRO JAVIER, 51, pleaded guilty before a federal judge to one count of conspiracy to steal federal funds by filing false returns to obtain up to $65 MILLION in faked reimbursals. Mr. Javier, allegedly, spoke of his support for Mr. Menendez and friendship with Dr. Melgen.)
Raphael Minder, "Princess Cristina of Spain Is Charged in Spain," The New York Times, June 26, 2014, p. A7. (Will alleged "Mafia Princess" Diana Lisa Riccioli be charged in New Jersey?)
Mark Mazetti, "Use of Drones for Killings Risks a War Without End, Panel Concludes in Report," The New York Times, June 26, 2014, p. A11. (A bipartisan panel warns of serious long-term consequences from the administration's illegal drone war.)
Chris Harris, "Child Sex Charges for Mahwah Man," The Record, June 20, 2014, p. L-3. (Horace K. Ashworth, 68, allegedly, abused a 6-year-old girl, but explained that, in New Jersey, "everybody does it.")
John C. Ensslin, "Demoted Director May File Suit: Removal Was Retaliation For Whistle-Blowing, Lawyer Says," The Record, June 26, 2014, p. L-3. (N.J. punishes and deems "unethical" those persons who expose corruption and government criminality. Jane C. Litner, allegedly, was demoted because of a whistle-blower lawsuit that she filed against Bergen County.)
AP, "N.J. Woman Admits Fraud in Tax Refund Case," The Record, June 27, 2014, p. A-3. (HALINA OKLA, 62, filed a false tax return seeking $350,000 in refunds. Ms. Okla claimed to "support" Bob Menendez.)
Karen Sudol, "Child Porn Sends Ex-Paralegal to Jail," The Record, June 27, 2014, p. L-6. (KEVIN REASE, 34, admitted distributing child porn from his law firm computer and has now been sentenced to 15 years in prison. Lawyers and judges in this man's network sharing his interest in kiddie-porn have not been named.)
Stephanie Clifford, "U.S. Attorney Joins Inquiry Into Spending by Prosecutor," The New York Times, June 18, 2014, p. A19. (More "irregularities" have been discovered in the accounts of Charles J. Hynes as Brooklyn's prosecutor and there are new inquiries into methods used to obtain convictions in that office. "Prosecutorial Misconduct.")
Neil Irwin, "Croney Capitalism, A Fact of Modern Economics," The New York Times, June 19, 2014, p. A3. (New Jersey has added "croney government" and "croney capitalism" to our lexicon.)
Steven Strunsky, "Weinberg Sets Sights on P.A. Bus Terminal," The Star Ledger, June 25, 2014, p. 7.
Steven Strunsky, "Investigators Probe Pulaski Funding: Gov. Christie's Plan Faces New Scrutiny," The Star Ledger, June 22, 2014, p. 6.
Investigations into both misrepresentations to investors by PA lawyers and officials as well as misuse of public funds by N.J. officials at that agency have to come from SEC and other federal officials, along with the New York District Attorney's office, because of concerns about corruption among county and state prosecutors in New Jersey. I concur. ("Mafia Influence in New Jersey Courts and Politics.")
Is "Steven Strunsky" also Steven Sweeney? No conflict of interest? Misrepresentation of fact? Failure to disclose bias? Can a public official also write, secretly, as a journalist or insert text into a journalist's articles without having a conflict of interest? ("New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System" and "Manohla Dargis Strikes Again!")
Sue Epstein, "Judge Who Is Accused of Hindering Apprehension Challenges the Evidence," The Star Ledger, June 25, 2014, p. 17.
Peter J. Sampson, "Media Heiress Loses Inheritance Suit: Court Finds No Undue Influence by Her Uncle," The Record, June 26, 2014, p. 1. (Incompetent decision by ESTELA DE LA CRUZ, leader of the Lesbian Love-Fest, who enjoyed sex with vulnerable and allegedly impaired women -- like Marilyn Straus -- usually giving such women a false name. Ms. De La Cruz also did favors for Diana Lisa Riccioli, an alleged sexual partner, even as "Judge" De La Cruz was happily married to a male person. Apart from the thefts from my office and other violations of legal ethics, these offenses merit removal from the bench. This recent Perleman decision will certainly be overturned on appeal. A hacker's attack seems to have altered this post or its width and/or extension.)
"A Superior Court judge in Middlesex County charged with hindering her boyfriend's apprehension for robbery is questioning the validity of some of the state's evidence against her."
Like Debbie Poritz seeking to make Diana Lisa Riccioli "happy"; or Stuart Rabner hoping to cover-up embarrassing matters concerning Ms. Poritz; or Estela De La Cruz sexually exploiting a vulnerable woman under hypnosis and/or drugging -- judges sometimes allow their judgments to be overcome by personal erotic or other desires. ("Marilyn Straus Was Right!")
This tendency to judicial "self-service" -- while understandable! -- nonetheless violates the Canons of Judicial Ethics in New Jersey. ("Sexual Favors For New Jersey Judges" and "Trenton's Nasty Lesbian Love-Fest!" then "Jennifer Velez is a Dyke Magnet!" and "N.J. Female Professor Rapes a Disabled Man.")
"In a motion filed in Superior Court in Somerville, CARLA BRADY's attorneys want a judge to compel the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office to produce for them 'authentic versions' of voicemails the judge [Ms. Brady] left for the Woodbridge Township Police Department."
Like the OAE, prosecutors at the county level may tamper with or alter transcripts to have them say the opposite of what was actually spoken by their target. ("Protecting Sex Workers.")
Such tampering with witnesses and obstructions of justice are routine features of legal proceedings in New Jersey courtrooms and administrative tribunals. ("John McGill, Esq., the OAE, and New Jersey Corruption" and "New Jersey's Office of Attorney Ethics" then "New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System.")
" ... 'We have not received in discovery authentic versions of the voicemails,' said Brady's attorney, Robert Scrivo, 'What we have received purports to be copies of the voicemails. We're looking to compel[,] through court order, the inspection and retrieval of the voicemails in a forensically acceptable way.' Scrivo said the voicemails are 'central to the prosecution and defense in this matter.' ..." ("Prosecutorial Misconduct.")
Judges' lovers and/or their drug dealers may receive special treatment from Superior Court officials and/or prosecutors and/or the judges themselves. This is to say nothing of the judges' pimps. ("Deborah T. Poritz and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" and "Diana's Friend Goes to Prison!" then, again, "Marilyn Straus Was Right!")
"Brady has been charged with two counts of hindering the apprehension of a fugitive for allegedly harboring JASON PROTNICKI, 42, in her Woodbridge home for about an hour" -- Is that how long it took? -- "on June 11, 2013, and 'never making any attempt to contact law enforcement,' according to the complaint filed against her. ..."
