July 19, 2013 at 4:50 P.M. Attempts to correct altered spacing of my story "The Allegory of the Cave" were prevented by New Jersey's hackers. I will try to make such corrections from public computers in the future.
July 9, 2013 at 9:19 A.M. It is difficult to imagine what legal defense the U.S. will offer to UN proceedings brought by multiple countries in response to U.S. illegal spying and so-called "data-theft" in their countries. U.S. complaints against China's alleged "data mining" have become absurd.
Pop-ups and other harassments make it clear that efforts are still being made to prevent me from writing at these blogs. I can never be sure of writing from one day to the next.
I renew my requests, after decades of repeated inquiries, for the full truth concerning spying on me, including hypnosis-based interrogation by the OAE and/or others, and all secret files and/or informer reports compiled against me in Trenton and elsewhere. ("New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System" and "Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture.")
July 8, 2013 at 2:00 P.M. It was necessary to shift from one computer to another in order to print today because of sabotage at NYPL, Morningside Heights. Shame on you, Mr. Rabner and OAE.
Peter Lattman & Ben Protess, "Many Paths Remain for a Case Against SAC," The New York Times, "Business Day," July 8, 2013, p. B1. (Steven A. Cohen and SAC will face fewer consequences than Mr. Corzine and MF Global after engaging in worse misdeeds.)
Larry Rohter, "Brazil Voices 'Deep Concern' Over Gathering of Data by U.S.," The New York Times, July 8, 2013, p. A7. (NSA spying includes the conversations of Brazilians, Cubans, Venezuelans, Bolivians and "Bolivarian Revolutionaries," as well as Europeans.)
James B. Stewart, "Boss's Remark, Employee's Deed and Moral Quandary," The New York Times, July 6, 2013, p. B1. (I wonder whether Terry Tuchin and John McGill were asking family members and friends to spy on me?)
William Neuman & David M. Herzenhorn, "Venezuela Offers Asylum to N.S.A. Leaker," The New York Times, July 6, 2013, p. A7. (I am hoping N.Y. will offer asylum from New Jersey persecution to those of us fleeing this dreadful oppression.)
How does it happen that a person of good conscience and will is led to abandon principles of decency and ethics that should govern his or her life? ("Does Senator Menendez have mafia friends?" and "Menendez Gets Over on the Feds.")
Part of the mystery in Jon S. Corzine's matters is figuring out how Mr. Corzine could fail to see the ethical implications of his actions and inactions, but more importantly, the meaning of what he was asking others to do. ("Have you no shame, Mr. Rabner?" and "Herbert Klitzner, Esq.'s Greed and New Jersey's Hypocrisy" then "Law and Ethics in the Soprano State.")
Mr. Corzine -- as New Jersey's former governor -- may have been among those conspiring to violate my civil rights by way of the actions of his appointed Attorney Generals, Mr. Rabner and Ms. Milgram. Now there is a deep pocket, Jon S. Corzine. ("No More Cover-Ups and Lies, Chief Justice Rabner!" and "More Mafia Arrests in New Jersey and Anne Milgram is Clueless.")
James Stewart's well-known writings dealing with financial shenanigans on Wall Street and his book on prosecutors -- like Chris Christie and Stuart Rabner, James Stewart began his professional life as a federal prosecutor -- sheds light on what continues to defy rational comprehension. ("Is Paul W. Bergrin, Esq. An Ethical New Jersey Attorney?")
What were you thinking, Mr. Corzine? Ms. Milgram? Why are people so willing to commit crimes when asked by authority figures to do so? ("New Jersey's Unethical Judiciary" and "Sexual Favors For New Jersey Judges" then "Trenton's Nasty Lesbian Love-Fest!")
Prosecutors and judges suffer from no lack of ego. Admitting an error often seems worse to such people than allowing for continued suffering by innocent victims of their blunders, including persons who are incarcerated unjustly. ("Justice For Mumia Abu-Jamal.")
Many prosecutors and judges reason that persons in prison may have done things for which they have not been charged. As a result, if they happen not to be guilty of the crimes for which they are serving time, it is no big deal. It all works out in the end. Such a view is not jurisprudential, but insane and evil.
Mr. Corzine seems to have made it clear to his co-defendant and former MF Global employee, Edith O'Brien, that she was to "dip into" client funds (if necessary) to cover cash short-falls in order to allow MF Global to continue to do business with Morgan Stanley. The term "loss of perspective" comes to mind. ("New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System" and "New Jersey's Office of Attorney Ethics.")
Perhaps much the same is true in New Jersey where ethics officials may have committed very serious crimes in order to generate a civil action against a politically-targeted individual, then even worse crimes in order to cover-up the original crimes. Mr. McGill? ("Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture" and "Is America's Legal Ethics a Lie?")
" ... When MF Global had to declare bankruptcy, about $900 MILLION in customer money had been taken and dispersed to meet the firm's obligations, [Is this ethical?] Last week the commission named both Mr. Corzine and Ms. O'Brien as defendants in a civil enforcement action, with Ms. O'Brien accused of numerous illegal transfers of customer money. [Stealing?]"
Such persons -- I call them "thieves" -- disapprove of my ethics. I disapprove of stealing.
To think of persons calling themselves "friends" cooperating with illegal efforts to violate my rights, merely because a person in authority asks them to do so, is bizarre to me. I hope these persons at least made a little money out of their betrayals of a friend and/or family member.
Authority is dependent on legitimacy in a democratic society. No one can ask you to spy on a friend or family member who has committed no crime. No interrogational torture/hypnosis is legal in America in a civil proceeding, much less when used against spouses or other family members by lawyers on a "fishing expedition." ("Corrupt Law Firms, Senator Bob, and New Jersey's Ethical Legal System" then "New Jersey's Politically-Connected Lawyers On the Tit.")
"The commission's complaint goes a long way toward explaining how customer money could have DISAPPEARED and it turns out the answer is fairly simple. There were no meaningful controls in place at MF Global, beyond Ms. O'Brien's conscience, to protect customers. The complaint suggests that Mr. Corzine, the firm's Chief Executive and a commanding figure apart from his position at the firm showed scant interest in regulatory issues or compliance in his rush to transform MF Global into another Goldman, Sachs."
"Underlings" in America are taught to "obey authority." Rarely, do people ponder the legitimacy of what they are asked to do by persons who seek to escape liability by having others do their dirty work. ("Abuse and Exploitation of Women in New Jersey.")
You should always refuse a request to inform on employers or friends when public officials are unwilling to go on the record with that request or to assume responsibility for what they ask others to do. A legal secretary should never assist in the violation of confidentiality and Constitutional rights.
You cannot, if you make such a request of innocent or ignorant persons, escape responsibility for their crimes committed at your request -- especially if you are a law enforcement official when you make such a request. ("New Jersey's Office of Attorney Ethics" and "An Open Letter to My Torturers in New Jersey, Terry Tuchin and Diana Lisa Riccioli.")
The principles of agency in New Jersey merely require "apparent authority" for actions by government agents. No one committing a crime through "agents" should escape liability for the harm caused to victims.
Mr. Corzine may have years of litigation ahead of him.
