Friday, March 1, 2013

Cybercrimes at These Blogs and Law Enforcement.

March 1, 2013 at 1:42 P.M. Continuing cybercrime at these blogs -- perhaps by "Stacey Wellesley" -- have caused me to refer the matter to law enforcement agencies while persisting in my efforts to bring these matters to federal court. (Is Stacey Wellesley also Manohla Dargis? Caitlin Flanagan? Carlotta Gall? etc.?)

I have received a letter from "KIMBERLY SALAZAR" of NYC Department of Consumer Affairs, attaching a purported response from CCA EOS that is signed by "JESSICA SOUSA." The text of Ms. Sousa's letter is virtually identical to the letter from "STACEY WELLESLEY."

I am sure that Ms. Sousa can identify "Ms.Wellesley" as an employee of the same company for which Ms. Sousa works. Actually, I suspect that both of these names are fictional.

My response to this Department of Consumer Affairs letter will be directed to Jonathan Mintz, Commissioner of this Agency, because I found the envelope in which this letter arrived to have been previously opened. I also have my doubts about the name "Kimberly Salazar."

I am not overly optimistic of receiving any reponse to my requests for the truth from Mr. Rabner or the OAE, even though they may be able to shed some light on these mysteries. ("Have you no shame, Mr. Rabner?" and "New Jersey's Office of Attorney Ethics.")

Telephone Calls: February 28, 2013 at 11:24 A.M. Calls were received at my home from 973-273-7847. February 27, 2013 at 8:42 A.M. Calls were received at my home, at all hours, from the same New Jersey source, allegedly, using different numbers: 2/27/13 at 8:07 P.M. call received from 718-670-0200 Time/Warner (cellphone?); 2/26/13 at 8:17 P.M. and 9:26 A.M., also from 718-670-0200, allegedly from "JAZMIN" and/or "MUHAMMAD" at Time/Warner. 2/26/13 at multiple times from 347-502-2593; again, 2/27/13 at 5:48 P.M. and numerous other times from 347-502-2583 and 303-293-2727.

It appears that most of these calls are made from automated call centers, at constant rates, by same entity or party. They are designed to disrupt sleep, harass, induce stress and enhance the effects of cyberstalking and other forms of psychological torture.

Please compare "Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture" and "An Open Letter to My Torturers in New Jersey, Terry Tuchin and Diana Lisa Riccioli" then "Psychological Torture in the American Legal System."

In response to my letters to prosecutors reponding to the harassing/bogus collection letter from CCA EOS ("Stacey Wellesley"), I have received a communication from Ms. Linda Tilley, Consumer Aid Division, South Shore Community Action Council, INC., 265 South Meadow Road, Plymouth, MA 02360, TEL. (508) 747-7575, EXT. 6226/6227, FAX (508) 746-5140. Case Number: 13-02-014.

I have provided a written response to the notice which appears below (with the case numbers that will be supplied to the authorities and may be added to this text after it is posted). ("Another Warm Letter From the DRB" and "The OAE and DRB Back Down.")


All communications pertaining to this matter will be in writing. This will make it difficult to misrepresent my remarks or for any confusion concerning my views to arise.

I am the only person authorized to speak on my behalf with regard to these or any other matters at this time. 

A copy of my response to Ms. Tilley and Ms. Salazar appears below and will be sent to the foregoing individuals and offices, with appropriate docket or case numbers, pursuant to my telephone calls, and (I assume) governmental monitoring of the "situation" at these sites for some time. Additional case numbers will be posted as they are received. 

Please feel free to follow these interesting developments in your state court systems, as members of the public or media and readers of these writings, whose rights may have been violated along with mine. This is all very educational:

Cyrus R. Vance, Esq.
New York District Attorney
(212) 335-9000
One Hogan Place
New York, N.Y. 10013
http://www.nyc.gov/da

Jonathan Mintz
Commissioner
Case Number: CD 500134247 -- Collection Company of America.
NYC Department of Consumer Affairs 
42 Broadway 9th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10004
http://www.nyc.gov/consumers

Martha Coakley, Esq.
Attorney General
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Office of the Attorney General
One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108
http://www.massgov/ago 
(617) 727-2200

Bill De Blasio, Esq.
Public Advocate
1 Center Street
15th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10007
http://www.hub.nyc.gov

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (w/enclosures)
26 Federal Plaza
28th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10278
(212) 384-1000.

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, R.R.
Ms. Linda Tilley
Consumer Division
South Shore Community Action Council, Inc.
265 South Meadow Road
Plymouth, MA 02360

Re: EOS CCA
      Case No.: 13-02-014. 

Dear Ms. Tilley:

The within matter is not a civil matter nor is it a subject for civil mediation.

EOS CCA is a bogus creditor or collection agent that admits no debt pertaining to me exists, or ever did exist, with their office. (See attached communication which is self-explanatory.)

Allegations of criminal harassment and other offenses have been made against EOS CCA and/or relevant individuals and/or entities that are under investigation by several prosecutors' offices and law enforcement agencies.

A list of some of these agencies and offices will be included with this letter to you.

I will post this letter on-line for purposes of public scrutiny and tranparency. A copy of this Internet post will also be sent to you.

Under the circumstances, there is nothing to "mediate" -- at a civil level -- that pertains to your office. 

All criminal investigations(s) will take their course in accordance with the law.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Very truly yours,

Juan Galis-Menendez

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, R.R.
Jonathan Mintz
Commissioner
NYC Department of
Consumer Affairs
42 Broadway
9th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10004
Dial 311 (212-NEW-YORK)

Re: Case No.: CD 500134247

Dear Mr. Mintz:

The attached letters are self-explanatory. I have reason to be concerned that the so-called "response" from CCA EOS is fraudulent as is the name of the signatory to that letter.

Perhaps "Kimberly Salazar" of your office will agree. The bright orange logo on your envelope is unusual for a government agency in New York. 

This matter is under criminal investigation and has been posted on-line. (See attached copy of blog post.)

I expect that the criminal investigation will proceed to conclusion in accordance with the law.

It appears that CCA EOS has now lied to several government agencies in responding to my complaint. It also appears that several false names have been used by CCA EOS in this correspondence.

You may wish to bear these facts in mind in further dealings with the responsible person or entity.

I will keep your office informed of developments in connection with this interesting exchange of views.  

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Very truly yours,

Juan Galis-Menendez